Skip to main content

Grain considerations (and weaving 101)

The shirt I'm making (haven't moved a finger on it yet: need to copy pattern, make muslin, make shirt!) will be made in a stripe fabric. However, as I said in my previous post, it has princess seams.

I've spent my day worrying that I won't be able to match the seam lines correctly if both bits of the princess seam are cut on the lengthwise grain. Then, at some point, I had an idea: what if I cut the bigger piece (middle) on the lengthwise grain, and the smaller piece (side) on the crosswise grain? This would make an interesting "almost-chevron" pattern.

The problem here though is that I didn't really know the difference between these. I always used the lengthwise grain because patterns say so. I've mostly kept away from bias due to its... stretchy nature.

If you're like me here is a Grains 101:

From threads magazine
I've now read up on the difference in several places on the internet. It bottles up to:

  • lengthwise: tough, non-stretchy; 
  • crosswise: semi-tough, some stretch, although waaaay less than the bias.
Why, you ask? Let's look at what a weave looks like:

Thank you, Wikipedia, for the picture
The lengthwise thread is the one going top-to-bottom. It does not stretch because it's already stretched on the mill. The crosswise thread is the one going left-to-right. It stretches a bit because it goes over/under the lengthwise thread, so it has a bit more give.

Here's a picture of a loom. I wanted a real picture, but figured that pointing out the two threads is more important:

From via Google Image Search

Lengthwise is the one which stretches from one side of the loom to the weaver. Crosswise is the one the weaver holds in her right hand. I actually saw one of these in real life - my grandmother used to have one when I was (very) young, maybe 5 or 6 years old?

Luckily, while finding this information I came across this very good Threads Magazine article so I was really spared the trouble of figuring out for myself whether my idea of cutting the smaller front piece crosswise was likely to end in tears.

The article actually quotes a designer who does exactly this for shirts, although having just spent the past 15 minutes on their website looking for an example and not finding it, it may be an antique fashion.

My plan is to actually test how this would work in my muslin. Stripes and all if I have enough stamina for it.


  1. I don't think cutting it on the cross grain will end in tears at all! If you're worried matching the stripes, then I would do just the same (cut it on the cross grain). Although it does have more stretch than the lengthwise grain, it's nothing like the bias.

    That is so cool you saw an actual loom when you were younger!

    1. I think I'll try to go ahead with cutting on the cross grain, but I don't think I can match the stripes - Mr T and I discussed the geometry of this (he loves maths) at length last night and arrived at the conclusion that what I want can be done if you can print the stripes according to a mathematical formula. The only way to really do it otherwise is to cut on the bias, and not a curve.

      Quite geekish, but true.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How to make silk bias binding

I promised this tutorial a while ago, but was too busy with work to get to it. This tutorial will focus on how to iron and fold the binding, rather than how to cut it. I have three links to good tutorials about how to do the correct cutting.

Here goes: a tutorial for properly making bias binding. Apologies for picture quality, I was using my phone.

Tools needed:
* silk square for the bias, sewing machine and scissors to make the continuous bias strip that will be ironed into place
* a 2-inch (5cm) wide piece of cardboard
* some sort of vaporiser, filled with water
* bias tape maker - for these pictures, I used a Clover which makes 1/2" binding (starts with 1" strips), but if I were to do this again, I'd use the one which makes a 1" binding (out of 2" strips)

* left-side: bias strip not yet passed through the bias maker
* right-side: bias strip which has been folded by the bias maker


1. Cut bias strips out of your silk square. I like this tutorial…

Pregnancy Pattern Round Up

Whilst I have been sewing these past 9 months, I haven't been posting much because in the past I was not massively keen on reading about people's pregnancy patterns. However, at some point I realized that I'm wrong and having some review out there would be useful, so decided to do a round up post about what I've learnt works and doesn't work in terms of this kind of sewing. This is a very long post :)

I had a fairly easy pregnancy, so I was perfectly positioned to have good results with sewing, which is great since maternity clothing is either decently priced and of bad quality, or expensive. Dime for dime, you get more out of non-maternity ready to wear.

Some lessons I learnt along the way:
Some non-pregnancy patterns will work for pregnancy. Sort of. As bump size increases, in the best case scenario you will get the mother of all pooling at the back, as if a gazillion-inch swayback is required (but isn't!). If that doesn't bother you, you're fine; otherw…

A new shirt

I made a white shirt. I cut this out sometime in late September, and I used McCalls 6035 again. I managed to finish it around Christmas. I wanted a nice white shirt, with a bit of a twist, so I added grey embelishments to it.

I am very pleased with how the embelishments turned out. I did a few things:
- embroidered the collar with French knots
- added grey/white twill tape to the sleeve seams
- used mother-of-pearl-with-grey-tint buttons

The effects are subtle, but they are there and I like them.

I embroidered the collar using two shades of grey, in a "burst" pattern. I tried to be relatively consistent about density of the French knots, but I think a bit of difference isn't very bad.

The collar was the first thing I finished, and it stayed there for a long time, until I found the time to get back to sewing.

I used a lot more interfacing on the collar than I normally do, and I think it shows. The buttons and tape on sleeves were added later and they're not very speci…